Influence of the Short-Range Order on Change of Residual Electroresistance in Binary Solid Solutions

P. V. Petrenko, M. P. Kulish, N. O. Mel’nikova, Yu. Ye. Grabovs’ky

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 60 Volodymyrska Str., UA-01033 Kyiv, Ukraine

Received: 05.12.2003. Download: PDF

The change of residual electrical resistance during isochronous and isothermal annealing of non-saturated solid solutions of Cu—Al, Ag—Al, Fe— Al, and Ni—Cr in a wide range of concentrations and with various initial states (deformed at 77 and 300 K, quenched from various temperatures, and annealed with a slow cooling) is studied in a given work. The investigation of short-range order is carried out for specimens of Cu—Al, Ag—Al, and Fe—Al alloys after same treatments by the method of X-ray diffuse scattering. As shown, the residual electrical resistance and absolute intensity of scattering, and hence, the Cowley’s short-range order parameters have the complicated change during an annealing. As suggested, the short-range order in these solid solutions is inhomogeneous. Not only the short-range order degree, but also its type determines the change of residual electrical resistance. The uniquely defined correlation between the residual electrical resistance and the short-range order parameter for the first co-ordination shell, $\alpha_{1}$, is absent for wide ranges of temperature and concentration.

Keywords: solid solution, short-range order, residual resistance, X-ray diffuse scattering.

PACS: 61.10.Eq, 61.72.Cc, 61.72.Dd, 61.72.Hh, 72.15.Eb, 81.40.Ef

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ufm.05.03.401

Citation: P. V. Petrenko, M. P. Kulish, N. O. Mel’nikova, and Yu. Ye. Grabovs’ky, Influence of the Short-Range Order on Change of Residual Electroresistance in Binary Solid Solutions, Usp. Fiz. Met., 5, No. 3: 401—432 (2004) (in Russian), doi: 10.15407/ufm.05.03.401


References (40)  
  1. W. Pfieler, Acta metallurg., 36, No. 9: 2417 (1988).
  2. R. Poerschke, U. Treis, and N. Wollenberger, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys., 10, No. 1: 67 (1980). Crossref
  3. Z. Trieb and G. Veith, Acta Metall., 26, No. 1: 185 (1978). Crossref
  4. M. K. Sardar and K. P. Gupta, Scripta Metallurg., 16, No. 5E: 1027 (1982). Crossref
  5. J. E. Epperson, P. Fürnrohn, and C. Ortiz, Acta Crystallogr., A34, No. 5: 667 (1978). Crossref
  6. V. E. Panin, V. P. Fadin, E. F. Dudarev, FMM, 13, No. 6: 886 (1962).
  7. J. M. Roland, X. Guillard, and S. K. Marya, Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 66, No. 1: 347 (1981). Crossref
  8. J. M. Roland, X. Guillard, and A. Moreau, Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 64, No. 1: 45 (1981). Crossref
  9. W. Gaudig and H. Warlimont, Acta Metall., 26, No. 5: 709 (1978). Crossref
  10. V. E. Panin, V. P. Fadin, L. F. Solov'ev, FMM, 13, No. 2: 219 (1962).
  11. V. F. Los and S. P. Repetsky, J. Phys. Condens. Mater., 6: 1707 (1994). Crossref
  12. N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, S. P. Repetskii, and T. D. Shatnii, Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 165, No. 2: 143 (1991). Crossref
  13. I. G. Batirev, A. A. Katsnelson, L. Kertesz, and A. Szasz, Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 100, No. 2: 479 (1980). Crossref
  14. P. V. Petrenko, Yu. E. Grabovskii, N. P. Kulish et al., Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 186, 465 (1994). Crossref
  15. L. M. Pakchanin, P. V. Petrenko, Yu. L. Pilipchuk, FMM, 60, No. 4: 703 (1985).
  16. B. Schonfeld, Progr. Mater. Science, 44: 435 (1999). Crossref
  17. N. P. Kulish and P. V. Petrenko, Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 120, 315 (1990). Crossref
  18. V. S. Zubchenko, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko et al., FMM, 50, No. 1: 113 (1980).
  19. J. E. Epperson and J. E. Spruiell, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 30, No. 7: 1734 (1969).
  20. S. Y. Yu, B. Schönfeld, and G. Kostorz, Phys. Rev. B, 56, No. 14: 8535 (1997). Crossref
  21. N. A. Mel'nikova, L. M. Pakchanin, P. V. Petrenko, Metallofizika, No. 40: 78 (1979).
  22. V. P. Kulichenko, N. A. Mel'nikova, P. V. Petrenko, UFZh, 24, No. 9: 1382 (1979).
  23. V. S. Zubchenko, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, Metallofizika, 2, No. 3: 75 (1980).
  24. V. S. Zubchenko, P. V. Petrenko, A. A. Tatarov, Izv. AN SSSR. Metally, No. 6: 113 (1983).
  25. Y. Tomokiyo, C. Kinoshita, and T. Equchi, J. Nucl. Mater., 69, No. 1–2: 683 (1978). Crossref
  26. A. Van den Beukel, P. C. J. Coremans, and M. M. A. Vrijhoef, Phys. Stat. Sol., 19, No. 1: 177 (1967). Crossref
  27. V. E. Panin, V. P. Fadin, L. D. Kuznetsova, FMM, 19, No. 2: 316 (1965).
  28. V. M. Davidovskiy, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, S. P. Repetskiy, FMM, 41, No. 3: 476 (1976).
  29. P. V. Petrenko, A. A. Tatarov, FMM, 56, No. 3: 507 (1983).
  30. Y. Tomokiyo, N. Kuwano, and T. Equchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jap., 35, No. 2: 618 (1973). Crossref
  31. Yu. E. Grabovskiy, V. M. Davidovskiy, N. P. Kulish et al., Metallofiz. noveyshie tekhnol., 19, No. 12: 16 (1997).
  32. P. V. Petrenko, N. P. Kulish, N. A. Melnikova, and Yu. E. Grabovskii, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 85, No. 4: 423 (1998).
  33. Yu. E. Grabovskii, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, and S. P. Repetskii, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 74, No. 4: 367 (1992).
  34. Yu. E. Grabovskiy, V. M. Davidovskiy, N. P. Kulish et al., Izv. AN SSSR. Metally, No. 4: 176 (1987).
  35. W. Gaudig and H. Warlimont, Z. Metallk., 60, No. 5: 488 (1969).
  36. M. R. Nagy, G. H. Deaf, and R. Kamel, J. Mater. Sci., 19, No. 1: 311 (1984). Crossref
  37. Yu. E. Grabovskiy, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko et al., FMM, No. 6: 144 (1992).
  38. N. P. Kulish, N. A. Mel'nikova, P. V. Petrenko et al., FMM, No. 12: 81 (1990).
  39. V. M. Davidovskiy, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, S. P. Repetskiy, FMM, 47, No. 3: 496 (1979).
  40. V. S. Zubchenko, N. P. Kulish, P. V. Petrenko, S. P. Repetskiy, UFZh, 25, No. 4: 541 (1980).